Bamber Case – New Evidence?

The telephone calls made by both Jeremy and Neville have been pivotal to the case.

Ex senior officer Peter Bleksley argues that the era was that of an analogue clock.

However, the times were clearly in digital format. 3:36 and 3:26.

The first digital watch was widely distributed in 1983 the most popular being Casio.

I was fortunate enough to have one and I was only 10 years old. I distinctly remember meeting Jon Pertwee who remarked about my watch.

So, the chances are the officer(s) may have worn a digital watch.

Silencer

It has been argued that the silencer was on the gun which killed all but one of the bamber family.

What has also been claimed is in how the gun was used to beat Neville. The same gun also used to shoot him and three others, so, why then, was it only Sheila’s blood found on the silencer if it was used? It seems a very fitting story.

Perhaps it was a case of cross contamination?

Or, the blood was not hers.

When Police Officers Leave Quietly

Serving police officers are public servants who have a duty to answer to the public through the force or head person.

This is not a new request, in fact I have been pushing for answers on this for years.

Nicholas Gargan – left the investigation into the crash which killed Diane and two others in France. Why?

Mark Williams Thomas – Left Surrey Police Force in 2000. No official explanation has been given. Why?

Martyn Underhill – Left Sussex police in 2009. Underhill claims his phone may have been hacked following a threat of exposure with a suspected personal relationship with a victim’s mother. He later became the PCC for Dorset Police.

Peter Powell – Dorset police officer who left in 1990/3. Why?

Thomas Mcleod – Left Dorset police between 1990 – 2000. Why?

All of the above officers known or unknown controversies warrant explanations to the public.

Officials have their book of rules and we have our book of rights!

Jonbenet Ramsey||Stun Gun or ?

60 Minutes Australia has put out another program on the case of Jonbenet. Experts this time focus on the small marks believed to have been inflicted by a stun gun.

The small marks are approx 4mm in diameter. Stun gun pins/prongs on most models are typically 2.5mm.

The width between each mark is 3cm.

So, what could have inflicted those injuries?

Typical bathroom shaver plug which may or may not have been connected to an appliance.

These US two-pronged plugs are not always earthed.

Shirley Banks Thumbprint and Document

During the interrogation of John Cannan it was put to him how Shirley’s thumbprint was found on a document inside of his flat.

A few things strike me as odd. Firstly, Cannan’s response and secondly the matter of a taxi being called to Cannan’s address. Would Shirley have known where she was and able to give an exact address? Secondly, did the document contain Cannan’s address? Thirdly, would Cannan let her use his phone without supervision?

Why is this important?

It is important because if Shirley never called a taxi, then who did?

It is certainly worth asking if the document aspect was a fabrication to not only fool John but everyone else into thinking she was in there – along with the taxi appointment.

There is no evidence she was there!

Suzy Lamplugh & Shirley Banks : Abduction theory

Let us say for arguments sake that Suzy was abducted by Cannan which involved somehow getting her out of her Fiesta and into his vehicle. This was in the 1980s where vehicles had no failsafe remote locking and doors could be opened from the inside by pulling up the stopper to then open the door.

So, was it not possible for Suzy to have escaped the vehicle when stopped at traffic lights? Now, if we bring a gun into the equation she may have been held under duress but the problem with that is the risk of it being seen.

And the (fact?) Julia Holman managed to get away in a similar scenario. As for Shirley, we have no solid proof she was in Cannan’s flat. None!

Can someone tell us why Cannan’s full prison record is being kept absent by mainstream sources?

Jill Dando|| Forensics

I have been asking for years if it is possible the killer was in her house and opened the door or Jill herself had indeed managed to open the door for the killer to then exit the door, force her down while closing the door and kill her. We do not know for certain if Jill turned the key and opened the door. The killer left the key in the lock. Naturally, they wanted nothing connecting them to the crime.

Her home had been up for sale and was vacant all but furniture.

We are expected to believe the killer got there on foot and waited to follow her down the path without Jill or neighbours seeing him as he’d likely need to hide. Nothing was found forensically in neighbouring gardens so, he could have easily been in her house and wearing gloves would have left no prints
Campbell said himself the killer wore gloves.. what’s the point if you’re going to get spattered with blood anyway? Gloves are predominantly used to prevent fingerprints. On a gun he could easily wipe? And, on a gun you are not planning on leaving behind?

No fibres from Barry George’s long length jacket were found at the scene. Oddly enough this is the one the gunpowder residue was found in.

So, what was the purpose of the gloves? Because he was inside the house all along?

Experts vs Failure (and lots of it).

If the private diving team who offered services in the case of Nicola Bulley are to be removed from a list of recommendations then should it not be the case that police forces who fail to find missing women be eliminated from policing?

How about media who fail to tell the truth on murder cases? Should they be shut down?

Or wannabe detectives who failed as police officers? Why are they not told to go away when they produce evidence for nothing but garner money and fame for their non efforts?

I’m and sick and tired of seeing plethoras of charlatans claiming to know the answers- or, in some cases coming up with ‘convenient for some’ outcomes.

Mi5/6 owe a lot of explaining to the public over data scandals yet they continue to operate as if they do no wrong.

From the top down they need to be told to accept accountability and stop yearning for rewards and knighthoods when you are already paid a salary to do a job – which – nobody can really understand. You come up with no evidence for your accusatory towards certain countries and you claim to be concerned when they try and get away with what both of your agencies have allowed to happen among your national/international bedfellows.

Mi5/6, the media and Westminster have become seriously out of control and embarrassing. The hounding of Harry’s and Meghan among other royals has gone completely ignored by Mi5/6.

The contempt for you all will keep on escalating

Like I said, your agencies have become embarassing yet you want your precious Knighthoods from the monarchy. How gullible is King Charles willing to be?

Get Back To The Drawing Board!

Serious attention continues to be given to pronouns and the furore over using innocent words such as he/she, they/them and male and female while other topics are not given even enough attention.

Out of concern of offending, I will refer to one such topic as Themopause as those of you who are on the ball will know of course I am referring to the Menopause – of females.

As somebody myself who is a victim of it – can I class myself as a victim, patient or sufferer? Is there a medical mainstream term for us yet? No. That’s just one reason for those of us affected to be offended. Too busy they are, ploughing into other areas of concern where no physical disability exists.

If you don’t like swearing then don’t swear but don’t expect others to follow. It’s because of bullshit such as this that people have the need to swear.

On top of this, only a few weeks ago someone who thinks they know what they are doing (a male?) decided women should not be given any further attention for menopause situations at work.

In the Courts/Out the Courts

The justice system needs a revamp.

For certain motoring offences we should abolish a court process and jury. 

For instance, someone caught driving at excess speeds such as 100mph should require police powers at the roadside to revoke a driving licence there and then.

Unless you are an emergency worker you are not authorised to drive at such speeds.

Speeds at lower levels need to be addressed in the same instance using automatic police powers. Harsh fines and temporary bans depending on the incident(s).

What we need to be mindful of is that offenders do not think they can simply pay fines and get off. We need a strike rule. More than one offence of dangerous motoring should lead to an instant roadside ban. A full retesting should be required before a licence is returned. Some motoring offences should warrant a theory and hazard perception retest or first test for those who have never done one if they passed their driving test pre 1995/6. Also, an increase on insurance cover should be mandatory for all driving offences. After all, if you want to keep putting others at risk you need to pay for it. Driving at stupid speeds does not make you an expert the longer you do it. Anticipation is a large part of driving. You cannot be eyes and ears for others when you throw them into chaos yourself by driving erratically around people.

Obviously we need to firstly pass a motion to give police such powers. And – not just traffic police. Community constables should be awarded such powers. Or, we do it all through the DVSA.

I understand there are crimes which do warrant a court, judge and jury and it is a complex issue. I do think we can simplify the processes perhaps.

Psychopaths and those who kill at random should be locked up for life or a very long time. Those kinds of people should not be on our streets. Obviously there must be a trigger for their actions and that is up to them to talk it out with the psychologists etc…

I would not rule out forms of mind control as a cause. Dark forces are not a myth.

We certainly need to catch up on accountability for traitors and officials – not forgetting those who seek vested interest or monetary or political gain.

Justice does not exist only for plebs!